<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://community.usms.org/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Regularity in swimmers and runners results</title><link>https://community.usms.org/swimming/f/general/8961/regularity-in-swimmers-and-runners-results</link><description>You can find Top 10 Men all time Australian best swims. Let us take long course men freestyle results and count arithmetical mean on how long ago the swimmers showed the result.
It looks as follows
50 m – 2.7 years ago
100 m – 3.7 years ago
200 m</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: Regularity in swimmers and runners results</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/141120?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:20:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:2ad9f2c5-42fa-4ed9-a75d-2fa3b287f3ae</guid><dc:creator>orca1946</dc:creator><description>This tech suit era will throw a blip in the results , I&amp;#39;m sure !&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Regularity in swimmers and runners results</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/141097?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:20:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:93124750-0e57-480f-a907-2c93dee6e7d0</guid><dc:creator>__steve__</dc:creator><description>Maybe the same test done for the 30 fastest 40-45 year-olds for each might shed something&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>