<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://community.usms.org/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Talk About Impact of Techsuit Ban Going Forward</title><link>https://community.usms.org/swimming/f/general/8587/talk-about-impact-of-techsuit-ban-going-forward</link><description>Garrett McCaffrey, Georgia Tech&amp;#39;s Chris DeSantis 
Talk About Impact of Techsuit Ban Going Forward 

I&amp;#39;m going to have my jammer on. 
If anyone wants to put a jammer on, feel free. 
I&amp;#39;m getting ready for where the sport is going. 
If I&amp;#39;m going to</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: Talk About Impact of Techsuit Ban Going Forward</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/134164?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:54:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:c6ee606e-c973-4f6a-8f14-0e5da0a8d861</guid><dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator><description>Someone who is stoned has a personality?

Stoned, not dead.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Talk About Impact of Techsuit Ban Going Forward</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/134075?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:34:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:7bc23481-1849-4473-a5a6-cdf2495eec19</guid><dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator><description>I think the lap dances and bong hits already show plenty of personality, though.


Someone who is stoned has a personality?&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Talk About Impact of Techsuit Ban Going Forward</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/134018?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:11:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:a7651003-797e-425b-a4cf-9ae745d9b5fe</guid><dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator><description>I agree with Dan here as well.  The alluding comment towards Biedermann was the own writer&amp;#39;s fantasy I believe.  I&amp;#39;m glad ole Phelps is starting now and not waiting until January.  November should be interesting.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Talk About Impact of Techsuit Ban Going Forward</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/134258?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 03:16:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:dba83efc-05a1-4d9c-a615-4fa7969bcaa2</guid><dc:creator>funkyfish</dc:creator><description>Agreed; the Garrett video (which I found interesting) says as much. They seem to like MP being controversial -- ie, showing some personality. I think the lap dances and bong hits already show plenty of personality, though.
I knew I was going to the wrong swim meets…no fair. 
:banana:&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Talk About Impact of Techsuit Ban Going Forward</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/134248?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 01:09:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:e9aafd2b-0ac5-4792-aeb6-88bc751542f7</guid><dc:creator>beluga</dc:creator><description>Someone who is stoned has a personality?
 
Ever been to a Grateful Dead concert? :applaud:&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Talk About Impact of Techsuit Ban Going Forward</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/133930?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:34:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:5269549a-5c89-4e25-b8bc-f823638cd1ce</guid><dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator><description>I bet he will!

I hated this sentence as well:  &amp;quot;Though he didn&amp;#8217;t name names, he likely had Paul Biedermann in mind. The German swimmer beat Phelps in the 200-meters in July while wearing a high-tech suit.&amp;quot;

It makes it sound like Phelps wasn&amp;#39;t wearing a &amp;quot;high tech&amp;quot; suit.  Gee, what is the LZR?

Sanctimony does not equal personality.

The writer of the article thought MP was talking about Biedermann. I read Phelps&amp;#39; comment as a broad one. He only raced Biedermann in one event. I don&amp;#39;t know what Phelps will race in the Word Cup but I assume it will include fly, free, and maybe 200 IM. I think he is challenging all of his opponents, not just Biedermann.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Talk About Impact of Techsuit Ban Going Forward</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/133847?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:30:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:7ffaadff-e3f5-44e9-89a9-b6baf452a641</guid><dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator><description>I know this is an old story but…
 
Mr phelps sanctimony it hard to take when considering he did not have trouble racing with the LZR in Bejing, when there were a lot of other swimmers struggling get similar suits. 
Now that his sponsor does not make the fastest suit, big M looks forward to going backwards to swimming in the jammer.

This is BS. No one in Beijing suffered for suits. Everyone in finals had a LZR, Tracer, B70, etc. Several country teams like Germany whined before Beijing that their Adidas suits were a handicap. 

Anyone watching the Olympics also saw MP race many times in a jammer or legskin instead of the fully body.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Talk About Impact of Techsuit Ban Going Forward</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/133830?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 11:23:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:0af0e5d9-7bc2-4d6b-a4d4-861048a023e8</guid><dc:creator>Allen Stark</dc:creator><description>I read Speedo&amp;#39;s press release and the new model is called &amp;quot;LZR Backwards.&amp;quot;

The RZL?&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Talk About Impact of Techsuit Ban Going Forward</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/133799?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 08:27:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:36d0c544-68ff-4702-a54e-b2e1d433adb8</guid><dc:creator>aquageek</dc:creator><description>Yes, Speedo has already rec&amp;#39;d approval for the new LZR something (they added a word).  It&amp;#39;ll be compliant with all 2010 rules.

I read Speedo&amp;#39;s press release and the new model is called &amp;quot;LZR Backwards.&amp;quot;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Talk About Impact of Techsuit Ban Going Forward</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/133788?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 08:25:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:0141c2ae-8d84-4d67-9341-146570fc71d3</guid><dc:creator>waves101</dc:creator><description>Yes, Speedo has already rec&amp;#39;d approval for the new LZR something (they added a word).  It&amp;#39;ll be compliant with all 2010 rules.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Talk About Impact of Techsuit Ban Going Forward</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/133767?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 01:56:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:1c2c33a8-49c4-4b07-9190-70a8d98bc225</guid><dc:creator>knelson</dc:creator><description>LOWER tech ?!  OK ,I already purchased a new jammer for this season. Do they make a HIGH TECH jammer ?

I think I heard Speedo is coming out with a new LZR model that will be legal.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Talk About Impact of Techsuit Ban Going Forward</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/133753?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:12:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:ff917508-7ece-4e55-9c95-d3528cde335f</guid><dc:creator>Calvin S</dc:creator><description>It makes it sound like Phelps wasn&amp;#39;t wearing a &amp;quot;high tech&amp;quot; suit.  Gee, what is the LZR?


there was an article in i want to say the washington post right after the phelps/cavic showdown at worlds in which the writer basically boiled the race down to a david v. goliath story.  here was cavic, the big bad smack talker with his high tech 100% polyurethane suit and poor little phelps, dwarfed by cavic and is tech suit, wearing a puny lzr.

i about gagged&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Talk About Impact of Techsuit Ban Going Forward</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/133614?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:58:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:26f14359-48fb-4e62-a6a7-29640dfcac0d</guid><dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator><description>I know this is an old story but…
 
Mr phelps sanctimony it hard to take when considering he did not have trouble racing with the LZR in Bejing, when there were a lot of other swimmers struggling get similar suits. 
Now that his sponsor does not make the fastest suit, big M looks forward to going backwards to swimming in the jammer.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Talk About Impact of Techsuit Ban Going Forward</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/133739?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:03:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:a5c0687a-5517-4b78-90d5-a057e08ec1f7</guid><dc:creator>orca1946</dc:creator><description>LOWER tech ?!  OK ,I already purchased a new jammer for this season. Do they make a HIGH TECH jammer ?&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Talk About Impact of Techsuit Ban Going Forward</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/133725?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 06:51:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:6cab86ed-af2c-442f-888c-39516a37d38a</guid><dc:creator>The Fortress</dc:creator><description>(However, in the likely event that Mr. Ross thrashes me at NE LMSC Champs, I am fully prepared to blame the tech suits. Even if he doesn&amp;#39;t wear one.)

I bet he will!

I hated this sentence as well:  &amp;quot;Though he didn’t name names, he likely had Paul Biedermann in mind. The German swimmer beat Phelps in the 200-meters in July while wearing a high-tech suit.&amp;quot;

It makes it sound like Phelps wasn&amp;#39;t wearing a &amp;quot;high tech&amp;quot; suit.  Gee, what is the LZR?

Sanctimony does not equal personality.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Talk About Impact of Techsuit Ban Going Forward</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/133701?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 05:22:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:bf7b21b1-ec73-4659-bf92-522d78432c42</guid><dc:creator>Chris Stevenson</dc:creator><description>MP, with endorsements galore, has less to lose than the other World Cup athletes.  Easy for him to say, and I don&amp;#39;t think he should get any kudos for it.

Agreed; the Garrett video (which I found interesting) says as much. They seem to like MP being controversial -- ie, showing some personality. I think the lap dances and bong hits already show plenty of personality, though.

It is likely that I&amp;#39;ll wear jammers at my SCM taper meet but don&amp;#39;t hold your breath waiting for me to exhort others to do the same.

(However, in the likely event that Mr. Ross thrashes me at NE LMSC Champs, I am fully prepared to blame the tech suits. Even if he doesn&amp;#39;t wear one.)&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Talk About Impact of Techsuit Ban Going Forward</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/133598?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 03:42:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:76d0db59-c065-4d51-a606-590d28ba7e93</guid><dc:creator>The Fortress</dc:creator><description>Ugh.  Another &amp;quot;moral victory&amp;quot; comment.

MP, with endorsements galore, has less to lose than the other World Cup athletes.  Easy for him to say, and I don&amp;#39;t think he should get any kudos for it.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>