<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://community.usms.org/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>No LZR / No Jaked / No X-Glide .. any WR since 2007 ?</title><link>https://community.usms.org/swimming/f/general/8319/no-lzr-no-jaked-no-x-glide-any-wr-since-2007</link><description>If you discount the Jaked and X-Glide records, you also have to discount the LZR records, even Phelps swimming only in the legskin. So who is actually swimming &amp;quot;faster&amp;quot; than any 2007 records ?

The British Backstroker Spofforth swam more than a second</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: No LZR / No Jaked / No X-Glide .. any WR since 2007 ?</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/129330?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:31:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:06ff0a04-4785-4071-85a4-41810899ee7c</guid><dc:creator>Chris Stevenson</dc:creator><description>Case in point Atlanta saw very few records.  Both *** records to Heyns, the 100 to Deburghraeve, and a couple relays.  That was it. 

The mid 90s didn&amp;#39;t see many records go.

I remember seeing some statistical analysis to the effect that Atlanta was improbably low, just as Beijing was abnormally high. I think that neither is a good guideline as to the number of records we could have expected, sans LZR.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: No LZR / No Jaked / No X-Glide .. any WR since 2007 ?</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/129276?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:40:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:623ca145-9b50-4e1f-b6e3-e749afcb7c83</guid><dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator><description>Case in point Atlanta saw very few records.  Both *** records to Heyns, the 100 to Deburghraeve, and a couple relays.  That was it. 

The mid 90s didn&amp;#39;t see many records go.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: No LZR / No Jaked / No X-Glide .. any WR since 2007 ?</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/129242?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:41:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:24ab8f50-63c1-4850-815a-f6253078247a</guid><dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator><description>Yeah - I messed up on the 100 Free records - 

USA swimming has a nice database for record progression - 

&lt;a href="http://www.usaswimming.org/USASWeb/DesktopDefault.aspx?TabId=87&amp;amp;Alias=Rainbow&amp;amp;Lang=en"&gt;www.usaswimming.org/.../DesktopDefault.aspx&lt;/a&gt;

Even so - there have been Olympic cycles without a lot of records. If you account for some of the rule changes and the evolution of the SDKs --- but then again - there will be new things to improve upon. 

I go back to the sub 21 though - I just can&amp;#39;t see anybody even close to that for decades in a regular suit.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: No LZR / No Jaked / No X-Glide .. any WR since 2007 ?</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/129211?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:27:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:9fefeb2a-3866-48b7-a76b-03c39a814e52</guid><dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator><description>Agreed, it will take YEARS, maybe even decades (like Mary T&amp;#39;s or Janet Evans&amp;#39;) for some of these to get broken.  

The Men&amp;#39;s 200/400/(1500?) Frees come to mind.  I think the men&amp;#39;s records set in leggings only might go down by 2012.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: No LZR / No Jaked / No X-Glide .. any WR since 2007 ?</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/129159?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:39:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:e130278f-a591-4e97-ad9d-0c9dbf974f6b</guid><dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator><description>For sure a very very short list .... You want to see a short list?  Come London if you compile a list of post tech world records that will be a short list.  We may not have a list at all!&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: No LZR / No Jaked / No X-Glide .. any WR since 2007 ?</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/129070?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:55:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:c2c51243-1fb7-43ea-89a5-d7a6134945fc</guid><dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator><description>Phelps did last night in legs only ! 

Can&amp;#39;t have it both ways -- 1:51.5 in a Legskin LZR is most likely slower than his 2007 1:52.0 ... but I forgot, the LZR only helps lesser swimmers :angel:&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: No LZR / No Jaked / No X-Glide .. any WR since 2007 ?</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/128991?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:52:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:f2bef1e0-3023-4d8b-8d8d-b7db3c78fc3d</guid><dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator><description>Jones in at least one of the breasts if she keeps her head together in that alternate timeline&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: No LZR / No Jaked / No X-Glide .. any WR since 2007 ?</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/128918?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:39:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:db6daee2-bddf-441d-8414-c8081fd526e4</guid><dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator><description>I have a very hard time believing there would only have been a handful of WRs in a 2-year span that included the Olympics.


Agreed - but I think we are also so used to records now. In 2004, there was only one indiv. women&amp;#39;s record in the entire year ... 

I guess we may find out next year, depending on what they agree on in terms of suits.

Close or in 2007 range ... Peirsol, Pelligrini I guess, Phelps, Lochte in the IMs, maybe the Men&amp;#39;s 50 Free ?

Not the 100 Fly girl though - no way

Not sure what they will be able to do in terms of records though -- you can&amp;#39;t really draw the line at 2007/08 - allow Thorpe&amp;#39;s full body suitrecord but then go back to just wearing jammers ? On the other hand, I don&amp;#39;t like to watch track and field, where some of the women&amp;#39;s records may never be broken.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: No LZR / No Jaked / No X-Glide .. any WR since 2007 ?</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/129132?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 07:38:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:f9e4989f-a7aa-46a9-81a4-9075b14dec3c</guid><dc:creator>Frank Thompson</dc:creator><description>Agreed - but I think we are also so used to records now. In 2004, there was only one indiv. women&amp;#39;s record in the entire year ... 

Are you sure this statement is right? I remember Libby Lenton/Trickett breaking the WR in the 100 meter Free and then Jodie Henry breaking that WR at the Olympics. I also remember that Amanda Beard broke the WR in the 200 meter *** at the Olympic Trials in Long Beach. What I remember about that WR is that Leisel Jones broke the tied WR that Amanda Beard held about 3 days before she got it back. So that is 4 WR that I can remember off the top of my head in 2004.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: No LZR / No Jaked / No X-Glide .. any WR since 2007 ?</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/128879?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 07:04:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:d208723a-e469-484f-a2d0-9fdc46a88589</guid><dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator><description>Ironically, Biedermann was in an Arena Revolution when he broke the 200m free short course record in 2008&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: No LZR / No Jaked / No X-Glide .. any WR since 2007 ?</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/129042?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 06:53:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:64b6bb34-9d31-412b-8e5a-e3d931870928</guid><dc:creator>knelson</dc:creator><description>How about women&amp;#39;s 200 IM? Kukors 2:06.1 is 3.6 seconds under the 2007 record (Yanyan Wu 2:09.72).&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: No LZR / No Jaked / No X-Glide .. any WR since 2007 ?</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/128970?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 06:37:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:49eef43b-296b-4c7b-a443-728e266419e4</guid><dc:creator>orca1946</dc:creator><description>Phelps did last night in legs only !&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: No LZR / No Jaked / No X-Glide .. any WR since 2007 ?</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/128815?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 05:28:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:4f3b0089-68d6-4c94-91c7-4e6e47184133</guid><dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator><description>Pellegrini and the Swedish 100 flyer might have. Pellegrini&amp;#39;s been the next big thing for a while now, and 100 flyer just might be a freak Mary T-like talent&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: No LZR / No Jaked / No X-Glide .. any WR since 2007 ?</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/128856?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 01:56:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:f7314584-f3f6-48e6-8503-bfe673677ce4</guid><dc:creator>Chris Stevenson</dc:creator><description>I have a very hard time believing there would only have been a handful of WRs in a 2-year span that included the Olympics.

A &amp;quot;very very short list.&amp;quot; Is there any reason to believe there would have been fewer than usual? Maybe the suits have made everyone poorer swimmers...:)&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>