<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://community.usms.org/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Professional Swimming League?</title><link>https://community.usms.org/swimming/f/general/8196/professional-swimming-league</link><description>The editorial in the current issue of Swimming World promotes the idea of a &amp;quot;Professional Swimming League&amp;quot; where technology would be allowed to run wild,where there would be monofin races,and even the idea of races with no lane lines and only 2 touch</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: Professional Swimming League?</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/126801?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 08:49:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:1e3f62f9-09b8-41a0-ac08-75f2216ca1ea</guid><dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator><description>Sounds like fun, but I think that individual sports where the goal is to get from point A to point B don&amp;#39;t tend to excite the general public.
 
Now if there were hungry sharks in the pool or allowed wardrobe malfunctions, then you might get the viewership up there.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>