https://community.usms.org/swimming/f/general/8032/fina-ruling--cliff-notesSpeedo LZR - ok B70- screwed royally Jaked/TYR- Split decision I can&#39;t find this part though, have they announced they will NOT ratify WR&#39;s set in the newly &quot;illegal&quot; suits? Or are we just assuming this?en-USTelligent Community 12https://community.usms.org/thread/123934?ContentTypeID=1Wed, 20 May 2009 16:18:40 GMT3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:73247eb0-ad5e-4a7c-87f5-1bddd64fb2e1Former MemberSpeedo LZR - ok B70- screwed royally Jaked/TYR- Split decision I can&#39;t find this part though, have they announced they will NOT ratify WR&#39;s set in the newly &quot;illegal&quot; suits? Or are we just assuming this? First, FINA has not yet said they are not going to ratify. Second, they specifically told me that they will never release a specific &quot;banned&quot; list. It&#39;s not really fair to a manufacturer to do that, when they can still resubmit.<div style="clear:both;"></div>https://community.usms.org/thread/124024?ContentTypeID=1Wed, 20 May 2009 12:45:21 GMT3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:4dbfa100-3c38-444b-9aa9-8366746d407cpwolf66First, FINA has not yet said they are not going to ratify. Second, they specifically told me that they will never release a specific &quot;banned&quot; list. It&#39;s not really fair to a manufacturer to do that, when they can still resubmit. Hmm, &#39;not approved for sanctioned competition&#39; ...... &#39;banned&#39; ........ The only difference is that it took more words to say the first one. The net result is the same.<div style="clear:both;"></div>