<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://community.usms.org/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>training- quality vs quantity</title><link>https://community.usms.org/swimming/f/general/3341/training--quality-vs-quantity</link><description>I would like the advice of some of you who have been at this a long time. What is the best yardage per day for a 50 year old quasi-sprinter who does no more than a 200 at a meet? Is it better to do 4 days at 3000 per day or make it 5 days at less yardage</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: training- quality vs quantity</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/30129?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2005 12:30:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:822d7af7-9dbf-4c46-9bd3-a3fa658b09d1</guid><dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator><description>I believe the study is probably accurate, but I still believe a swimmer, runner, or cyclist still needs the big base of endurance miles/yards to make it thru the season without getting injured.  Just my opinion.  Everybody has one.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: training- quality vs quantity</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/30044?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 15:22:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:3edacd04-dc7f-4573-90f4-5a57621d542d</guid><dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator><description>I just heard on Dr. Dean Edell yesterday that some research has shown that a few short bursts of maximum effort exercise has the same effect on endurance as long drawn out workouts.  I think the short workout were less than a few minutes long and after a few weeks they had the cumulative effect of weeks of typical hour long workouts.  Food for thought.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: training- quality vs quantity</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/30038?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 11:15:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:d06ab633-ea93-4389-bc3f-7c5bd516c97f</guid><dc:creator>waves101</dc:creator><description>Sounds like your training is fine.  4 or 5 days per week with those yardages should be good prep for LC Nats.  A week or two before the meet start your taper (decreased yardage - increased intervals). It will supply the needed boost to perform.  Good Luck!&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: training- quality vs quantity</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/30082?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 07:13:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:7c7bce51-8de0-45ce-a4dc-cfaed6905c14</guid><dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator><description>It could be different research but I recently heard about similar findings but the study actually dealt with not very fit subjects rather than athletes. I can&amp;#39;t quickly find a reference though.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>