<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://community.usms.org/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Bikers beware - Ulocks not neccessarily safe</title><link>https://community.usms.org/swimming/f/general/2563/bikers-beware---ulocks-not-neccessarily-safe</link><description>While this came to me in an email, the video URL appears to display some merit to the claim. I am not supporting this assertion, however I think it is worthy of review and investigation for those of us using these bike locks on our very valuable bikes</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: Bikers beware - Ulocks not neccessarily safe</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/18329?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2004 06:17:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:7ad660de-aefd-486e-b354-a1341bdb832a</guid><dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator><description>oops not sure if it was the News or the Post, but still it was in a NY paper. same as what is on the blog.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Bikers beware - Ulocks not neccessarily safe</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/18289?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2004 06:07:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:46cc79c3-4acc-4c3d-8ca2-a520fb7c9daf</guid><dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator><description>i saw this in an article in the New York Daily News this past week, can&amp;#39;t remember the exact date, but it was very interesting to read.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>