<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://community.usms.org/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Interval Racing</title><link>https://community.usms.org/swimming/f/general/11800/interval-racing</link><description>The Brisbane Grand Prix this weekend has interval racing. 

 www.swimming.org.au/.../2014_GP_2_Program.pdf 

3 x 200m Free will be swum on 3 minutes, enter using your 800m Time
3 x 300m Free will be swum on 4 minutes, enter using your 800m/1500m</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: Interval Racing</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/190810?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 16:50:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:c4258599-23ae-4c96-b6e7-ead313f56f03</guid><dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator><description>Would be curious if each interval is done with a dive or a push?  Or is it a dive on first one then push the next two?  Or dive all three?  Or push all three?  (I don&amp;#39;t think two dives and one push or a dive-push-dive would really be an option).  How is the start of each interval handled so that it is accurate to the 1/100th of a sec?  Just wondering outside the bun :)&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Interval Racing</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/190843?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 12:55:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:241c9c4b-a339-4b15-8517-7420e75df0cb</guid><dc:creator>knelson</dc:creator><description>Good questions, Chris. I would assume they just let the clock run and determine the time for each swim based on the split recorded by the pad.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Interval Racing</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/190803?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2014 09:37:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:879b32f6-69fa-4991-a0dc-0ba2b2c3863b</guid><dc:creator>That Guy</dc:creator><description>Braden Keith didn&amp;#39;t seem to know that these were broken swims.

&lt;a href="http://swimswam.com/cate-campbell-just-misses-world-leading-time-100-free-australia-grand-prix-2/"&gt;swimswam.com/.../&lt;/a&gt;

We&amp;#8217;re not quite sure what it means, but Katie Goldman was a 6:11.25 in the women&amp;#8217;s 600 meter free final. What little context we have is that this is a medal-winning split to an 800 free at Worlds last year (Ledecky and Friis were both right around 6:11), though of course tagging on another 200 meters is a task not to be taken lightly. It&amp;#8217;s certainly a good position for her medal chances at the Commonwealth Games and Pan Pacs.

Finally, in the men&amp;#8217;s 900 free, Mack Horton was an 8:43.99 for the win. That paces out to a 7:45 over 800 meters, which would have been 5th at Worlds last year even having the extra 100 on the end. That, we know, is an impressive swim.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Interval Racing</title><link>https://community.usms.org/thread/190796?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 11:53:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3187ac58-ba85-4314-b79a-c45cd885e09a:33ca5581-badc-433f-a5a5-ae08c31cec9b</guid><dc:creator>rxleakem</dc:creator><description>That is pretty interesting. I&amp;#39;ve never heard of that before at a meet.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>